You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feather arrays are patterned by interacting signalling and cell density waves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William K. W. Ho, Lucy Freem, Debiao Zhao, Kevin J. Painter, Thomas E. Woolley, Eamonn A. Gaffney, Michael J. McGrew, Athanasia Tzika, Michel C. Milinkovitch, Pascal Schneider, Armin Drusko, Franziska Matthäus, James D. Glover, Kirsty L. Wells, Jeanette A. Johansson, Megan G. Davey, Helen M. Sang, Michael Clinton, Denis J. Headon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 12% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Finland | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 54% |
| Scientists | 39 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 25% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#388,378
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#788
of 9,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,816
of 367,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#23
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.