Title |
Serum Selenium Levels and Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Trace Element Research, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12011-017-0982-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Du He, Zaiping Wang, Chuying Huang, Xiping Fang, Dian Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
Chemistry | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,186,639
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#47
of 2,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,779
of 311,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,061 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.