You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Island questions: the chronology of the Brochtorff Circle at Xagħra, Gozo, and its significance for the Neolithic sequence on Malta
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00790-y |
Authors |
Caroline Malone, Nathaniel Cutajar, T. Rowan McLaughlin, Bernardette Mercieca-Spiteri, Anthony Pace, Ronika K. Power, Simon Stoddart, Sharon Sultana, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Elaine Dunbar, Alex Bayliss, Frances Healy, Alasdair Whittle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Malta | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 8 | 47% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,377,600
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#154
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,933
of 353,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.