↓ Skip to main content

Venezuela's humanitarian crisis, resurgence of vector-borne diseases, and implications for spillover in the region

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
745 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Venezuela's humanitarian crisis, resurgence of vector-borne diseases, and implications for spillover in the region
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30757-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria E Grillet, Juan V Hernández-Villena, Martin S Llewellyn, Alberto E Paniz-Mondolfi, Adriana Tami, Maria F Vincenti-Gonzalez, Marilianna Marquez, Adriana C Mogollon-Mendoza, Carlos E Hernandez-Pereira, Juan D Plaza-Morr, Gabriella Blohm, Mario J Grijalva, Jaime A Costales, Heather M Ferguson, Philipp Schwabl, Luis E Hernandez-Castro, Poppy H L Lamberton, Daniel G Streicker, Daniel T Haydon, Michael A Miles, Alvaro Acosta-Serrano, Harry Acquattela, Maria G Basañez, Gustavo Benaim, Luis A Colmenares, Jan E Conn, Raul Espinoza, Hector Freilij, Mary C Graterol-Gil, Peter J Hotez, Hirotomo Kato, John A Lednicky, Clara E Martinez, Santiago Mas-Coma, J Glen Morris, Juan C Navarro, Jose L Ramirez, Marlenes Rodriguez, Julio A Urbina, Leopoldo Villegas, Maikell J Segovia, Hernan J Carrasco, James L Crainey, Sergio L B Luz, Juan D Moreno, Oscar O Noya Gonzalez, Juan D Ramírez, Belkisyolé Alarcón-de Noya

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 745 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 306 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 16%
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 77 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 108 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 826. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#22,758
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#123
of 6,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#461
of 367,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#2
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 90.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.