| Title |
Conserving adaptive potential: lessons from Tasmanian devils and their transmissible cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-019-01157-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul A. Hohenlohe, Hamish I. McCallum, Menna E. Jones, Matthew F. Lawrance, Rodrigo K. Hamede, Andrew Storfer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#552,906
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#15
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,431
of 461,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.