↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical circulatory support for elderly heart failure patients

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical circulatory support for elderly heart failure patients
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10741-012-9298-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig R. Butler, Bodh I. Jugdutt

Abstract

End-stage systolic heart failure is an increasingly common problem in elderly patients and is associated with high cost, poor quality of life, and poor outcomes. Mechanical circulatory support is a promising therapy as both a bridge to transplantation and destination therapy. Elderly patients are frequently ineligible for heart transplantation because of their age and comorbidities, and the application of mechanical circulatory support for destination therapy in this population is not well defined. A review of the literature was undertaken to better characterize our experience to date with mechanical circulatory support in older heart failure populations. Mechanical circulatory support is being employed increasingly for destination therapy indications in older patients. The newer continuous flow devices appear to have disproportionate advantage in elderly patients, which has translated into marked improvement in 1- and 2-year survival. The rational implementation of MCS devices in elderly heart failure patients needs to focus on (1) continuous flow devices that appear to have particular benefit in this population, (2) extensive pre-MCS assessment including variables relating to frailty, and (3) intervening before these patients develop cardiogenic shock. More data are needed on the cost-benefit analysis of routine use of CF devices as destination therapy in elderly patients with heart failure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 24%