↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic modifications in cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Basic Research in Cardiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Epigenetic modifications in cardiovascular disease
Published in
Basic Research in Cardiology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00395-012-0245-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan M. Lorenzen, Filippo Martino, Thomas Thum

Abstract

Epigenetics represents a phenomenon of altered heritable phenotypic expression of genetic information occurring without changes in DNA sequence. Epigenetic modifications control embryonic development, differentiation and stem cell (re)programming. These modifications can be affected by exogenous stimuli (e.g., diabetic milieu, smoking) and oftentimes culminate in disease initiation. DNA methylation has been studied extensively and represents a well-understood epigenetic mechanism. During this process cytosine residues preceding a guanosine in the DNA sequence are methylated. CpG-islands are short-interspersed DNA sequences with clusters of CG sequences. The abnormal methylation of CpG islands in the promoter region of genes leads to a silencing of genetic information and finally to alteration of biological function. Emerging data suggest that these epigenetic modifications also impact on the development of cardiovascular disease. Histone modifications lead to the modulation of the expression of genetic information through modification of DNA accessibility. In addition, RNA-based mechanisms (e.g., microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs) influence the development of disease. We here outline the recent work pertaining to epigenetic changes in a cardiovascular disease setting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 17%
Engineering 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,412,246
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#180
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,581
of 243,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.