↓ Skip to main content

スギ花粉症有病率の地域差について

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
スギ花粉症有病率の地域差について
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, January 2010
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.59.47
Authors

村山 貢司, 馬場 廣太郎, 大久保 公裕

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Other 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#55
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,374
of 172,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them