You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms of a coniferous woodland persistence under drought and heat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0921 |
| Authors |
Nate G McDowell, Charlotte Grossiord, Henry D Adams, Sara Pinzón-Navarro, D Scott Mackay, David D Breshears, Craig D Allen, Isaac Borrego, L Turin Dickman, Adam Collins, Monica Gaylord, Natalie McBranch, William T Pockman, Alberto Vilagrosa, Brian Aukema, Devin Goodsman, Chonggang Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 34% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 25 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 62% |
| Scientists | 21 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 37 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,174,494
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1,490
of 6,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,698
of 348,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#36
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.