↓ Skip to main content

Relationship of exercise volume to improvements of quality of life with supervised exercise training in patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial: the Italian Diabetes and…

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Relationship of exercise volume to improvements of quality of life with supervised exercise training in patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomised controlled trial: the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES)
Published in
Diabetologia, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00125-011-2425-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Nicolucci, S. Balducci, P. Cardelli, S. Cavallo, S. Fallucca, A. Bazuro, P. Simonelli, C. Iacobini, S. Zanuso, G. Pugliese, for the Italian Diabetes Exercise Study (IDES) Investigators

Abstract

A positive impact of exercise intervention programmes on quality of life (QoL) may be important for long-term patient compliance to exercise recommendations. We have previously shown that QoL improves significantly with supervised exercise, whereas it worsens with counselling alone, in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES). Here, we report data on the relationship between changes in QoL and volume of physical activity/exercise in these individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 17%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 51 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 25%
Sports and Recreations 40 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 12%
Psychology 15 6%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 57 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,574,624
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,373
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,653
of 243,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#19
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.