| Title |
Inter-individual differences in ontogenetic trophic shifts among three marine predators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-019-04357-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip Matich, Jeremy J. Kiszka, Michael R. Heithaus, Baptiste Le Bourg, Johann Mourier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| French Polynesia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 49% |
| Scientists | 23 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,216,817
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#118
of 4,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,575
of 358,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.