↓ Skip to main content

Family Factors in the Development, Treatment, and Prevention of Childhood Anxiety Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
Title
Family Factors in the Development, Treatment, and Prevention of Childhood Anxiety Disorders
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10567-011-0109-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly L. Drake, Golda S. Ginsburg

Abstract

It is now widely accepted that anxiety disorders run in families, and current etiological models have proposed both genetic and environmental pathways to anxiety development. In this paper, the familial role in the development, treatment, and prevention of anxiety disorders in children is reviewed. We focus on three anxiety disorders in youth, namely, generalized, separation, and social anxiety as they often co-occur both at the symptom and disorder level and respond to similar treatments. We begin by presenting an overview of a broad range of family factors associated with anxiety disorders. Findings from these studies have informed intervention and prevention strategies that are discussed next. Throughout the paper we shed light on the challenges that plague this research and look toward the future by proposing directions for much needed study and discussing factors that may improve clinical practice and outcomes for affected youth and their families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 321 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 23%
Student > Bachelor 50 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 9%
Researcher 22 7%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 67 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 171 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 7%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 72 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,660,617
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#240
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,042
of 248,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.