| Title |
Effects of grazing on plant composition, conservation status and ecosystem services of Natura 2000 shrub-grassland habitat types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01718-7 |
| Authors |
Vasco Silva, Filipe X. Catry, Paulo M. Fernandes, Francisco C. Rego, Paula Paes, Leónia Nunes, Ana D. Caperta, Cecília Sérgio, Miguel N. Bugalho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 21% |
| Portugal | 3 | 13% |
| Sweden | 2 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,095,103
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#290
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,521
of 367,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.