| Title |
Why Trumpcare failed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.1095414 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roger Collier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 67% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#664,672
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,056
of 9,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,431
of 325,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#30
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.