| Title |
Regional ash fall hazard I: a probabilistic assessment methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00445-012-0627-8 |
| Authors |
Susanna Jenkins, Christina Magill, John McAneney, Russell Blong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,314
of 167,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.