You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges in creating dissectible anatomical 3D prints for surgical teaching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anatomy, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/joa.12934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ratheesraj Ratinam, Michelle Quayle, John Crock, Michelle Lazarus, Quentin Fogg, Paul McMenamin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 23 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#14,924,861
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#1,557
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,309
of 437,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.