↓ Skip to main content

Predicting outcomes of chronic kidney disease from EMR data based on Random Forest Regression

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Biosciences, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting outcomes of chronic kidney disease from EMR data based on Random Forest Regression
Published in
Mathematical Biosciences, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.mbs.2019.02.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Zhao, Shaopeng Gu, Adam McDermaid

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 26 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Computer Science 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 31 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Biosciences
#779
of 886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395,195
of 457,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Biosciences
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.