| Title |
Effect of different cooking methods on the content of vitamins and true retention in selected vegetables
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Science and Biotechnology, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10068-017-0281-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seongeung Lee, Youngmin Choi, Heon Sang Jeong, Junsoo Lee, Jeehye Sung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 18% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 539 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 539 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 113 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 54 | 10% |
| Unknown | 228 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 4% |
| Engineering | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 71 | 13% |
| Unknown | 247 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 506. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#51,679
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Food Science and Biotechnology
#2
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,119
of 446,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Science and Biotechnology
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.