↓ Skip to main content

How trustworthy are apps for maternal and child health?

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Technology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
How trustworthy are apps for maternal and child health?
Published in
Health and Technology, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12553-015-0099-x
Authors

Karen M. Scott, Gastao A. Gome, Deborah Richards, Patrina H. Y. Caldwell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Engineering 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 35 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,031,982
of 24,618,500 outputs
Outputs from Health and Technology
#212
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,590
of 263,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Technology
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.