↓ Skip to main content

Incentives for aquaculture in protected areas: possible consequences for biodiversity and its services in southern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Incentives for aquaculture in protected areas: possible consequences for biodiversity and its services in southern Brazil
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10531-019-01726-7
Authors

Jorge L. Rodrigues Filho, Débora Lugli-Bernardes, Lia Mayrink Sabinson, Rodrigo Machado, Harry Boos, Luciano Lorenzi, Marcelo Manoel Domingos, David Valença Dantas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,168,659
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,717
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,397
of 356,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#37
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.