↓ Skip to main content

Toolboxes for a standardised and systematic study of glycans

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toolboxes for a standardised and systematic study of glycans
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-s1-s9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew P Campbell, René Ranzinger, Thomas Lütteke, Julien Mariethoz, Catherine A Hayes, Jingyu Zhang, Yukie Akune, Kiyoko F Aoki-Kinoshita, David Damerell, Giorgio Carta, Will S York, Stuart M Haslam, Hisashi Narimatsu, Pauline M Rudd, Niclas G Karlsson, Nicolle H Packer, Frédérique Lisacek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Researcher 13 21%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Engineering 6 10%
Computer Science 6 10%
Chemistry 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,026
of 7,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,901
of 305,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#42
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.