↓ Skip to main content

CD20+ B-cell depletion therapy suppresses murine CD8+ T-cell–mediated immune thrombocytopenia

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD20+ B-cell depletion therapy suppresses murine CD8+ T-cell–mediated immune thrombocytopenia
Published in
Blood, November 2015
DOI 10.1182/blood-2015-06-655126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Guo, Rick Kapur, Rukshana Aslam, Edwin R Speck, Anne Zufferey, Yajing Zhao, Michael Kim, Alan H Lazarus, Heyu Ni, John W Semple

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with a complex pathogenesis which includes both antibody- and T cell-mediated effector mechanisms. Rituximab (an anti-human CD20 monoclonal antibody) is one of the treatments for ITP and is known to deplete B cells but may also work by affecting the T cell compartments. Here we investigated the outcome of B cell depletion (Bdep) therapy on CD8(+) T cell-mediated ITP using a murine model. CD61 knockout (KO) mice were immunized with CD61(+) platelets and T cell-mediated ITP was initiated by transfer of their splenocytes into severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice. The CD61 KO mice were administrated an anti-mouse CD20 monoclonal antibody either before or after CD61(+) platelet immunization. This resulted in efficient Bdep in vivo, accompanied by significant increases in splenic and lymph node CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and proportional increases of FOXP3(+) in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Moreover, Bdep therapy resulted in significantly decreased splenic CD8(+) T cell proliferation in vitro that could be rescued by interleukin-2 (IL-2). This correlated with normalization of in vivo platelet counts in the transferred SCID mice suggesting that anti-CD20 therapy significantly reduces the ability of CD8(+) T cells to activate and mediate ITP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#26,002
of 33,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,798
of 294,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#382
of 584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.