↓ Skip to main content

Unitary and non-unitary N = 2 minimal models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Unitary and non-unitary N = 2 minimal models
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/jhep06(2019)024
Authors

Thomas Creutzig, Tianshu Liu, David Ridout, Simon Wood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,749,194
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#5,330
of 24,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,422
of 368,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#103
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.