| Title |
Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-009-0010-2 |
| Authors |
Richard Frankham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 494 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 21% |
| Researcher | 96 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 86 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 340 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 53 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 3% |
| Unknown | 66 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,998,771
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#167
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,768
of 97,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.