↓ Skip to main content

The water balance of northern Africa during the mid-Holocene: an evaluation of the 6 ka BP PMIP simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The water balance of northern Africa during the mid-Holocene: an evaluation of the 6 ka BP PMIP simulations
Published in
Climate Dynamics, June 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00382-001-0219-3
Authors

M. Coe, S. Harrison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 46%
Environmental Science 7 27%
Energy 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,013
of 4,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,658
of 120,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.