↓ Skip to main content

The HIV-1 Env Protein: A Coat of Many Colors

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 473)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
The HIV-1 Env Protein: A Coat of Many Colors
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11904-011-0107-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Twigg Arrildt, Sarah Beth Joseph, Ronald Swanstrom

Abstract

HIV-1 is completely dependent upon the Env protein to enter cells. The virus typically replicates in activated CD4+ T cells due to viral entry requirements for the CCR5 coreceptor and for high surface levels of the CD4 receptor. This is the case for the transmitted virus and for most of the virus sampled in the blood. Over the course of infection, the env gene can evolve to encode a protein with altered receptor and coreceptor usage allowing the virus to enter alternative host cells. In about 50% of HIV-1 infections, the viral population undergoes coreceptor switching, usually late in disease, allowing the virus to use CXCR4 to enter a different subset of CD4+ T cells. Neurocognitive disorders occur in about 10% of infections, also usually late in disease, but caused (ultimately) by viral replication in the brain either in CD4+ T cells or macrophage and/or microglia. Expanded host range is significantly intertwined with pathogenesis. Identification and characterization of such HIV-1 variants may be useful for early detection which would allow intervention to reduce viral pathogenesis in these alternative cell types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Student > Master 33 15%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 61 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 67 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#660,892
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#7
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,582
of 249,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them