| Title |
When Jump Height is not a Good Indicator of Lower Limb Maximal Power Output: Theoretical Demonstration, Experimental Evidence and Practical Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-019-01073-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Benoit Morin, Pedro Jiménez-Reyes, Matt Brughelli, Pierre Samozino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 31 | 17% |
| United States | 14 | 8% |
| France | 11 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| Japan | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 124 | 70% |
| Scientists | 44 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 291 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 75 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 152 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 93 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#376,978
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#372
of 2,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,628
of 367,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#10
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.