↓ Skip to main content

Variable DNA methylation in neonates mediates the association between prenatal smoking and birth weight

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variable DNA methylation in neonates mediates the association between prenatal smoking and birth weight
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2019
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2018.0120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eilis Hannon, Diana Schendel, Christine Ladd-Acosta, Jakob Grove, Christine Søholm Hansen, David Michael Hougaard, Michaeline Bresnahan, Ole Mors, Mads Vilhelm Hollegaard, Marie Bækvad-Hansen, Mady Hornig, Preben Bo Mortensen, Anders D. Børglum, Thomas Werge, Marianne Giørtz Pedersen, Merete Nordentoft, Joseph D. Buxbaum, M. Daniele Fallin, Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm, Abraham Reichenberg, Jonathan Mill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 6 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 36 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Psychology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 41 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,263,096
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,095
of 7,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,660
of 371,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#68
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.