↓ Skip to main content

Genetic landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identifies heterogeneous cell-type and phenotype associations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
84 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identifies heterogeneous cell-type and phenotype associations
Published in
Nature Genetics, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41588-018-0342-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phuwanat Sakornsakolpat, Dmitry Prokopenko, Maxime Lamontagne, Nicola F. Reeve, Anna L. Guyatt, Victoria E. Jackson, Nick Shrine, Dandi Qiao, Traci M. Bartz, Deog Kyeom Kim, Mi Kyeong Lee, Jeanne C. Latourelle, Xingnan Li, Jarrett D. Morrow, Ma’en Obeidat, Annah B. Wyss, Per Bakke, R. Graham Barr, Terri H. Beaty, Steven A. Belinsky, Guy G. Brusselle, James D. Crapo, Kim de Jong, Dawn L. DeMeo, Tasha E. Fingerlin, Sina A. Gharib, Amund Gulsvik, Ian P. Hall, John E. Hokanson, Woo Jin Kim, David A. Lomas, Stephanie J. London, Deborah A. Meyers, George T. O’Connor, Stephen I. Rennard, David A. Schwartz, Pawel Sliwinski, David Sparrow, David P. Strachan, Ruth Tal-Singer, Yohannes Tesfaigzi, Jørgen Vestbo, Judith M. Vonk, Jae-Joon Yim, Xiaobo Zhou, Yohan Bossé, Ani Manichaikul, Lies Lahousse, Edwin K. Silverman, H. Marike Boezen, Louise V. Wain, Martin D. Tobin, Brian D. Hobbs, Michael H. Cho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Professor 14 5%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 72 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 80 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#414,991
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#835
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,472
of 370,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.