↓ Skip to main content

Biological and clinical insights from genetics of insomnia symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
96 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological and clinical insights from genetics of insomnia symptoms
Published in
Nature Genetics, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41588-019-0361-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline M. Lane, Samuel E. Jones, Hassan S. Dashti, Andrew R. Wood, Krishna G. Aragam, Vincent T. van Hees, Linn B. Strand, Bendik S. Winsvold, Heming Wang, Jack Bowden, Yanwei Song, Krunal Patel, Simon G. Anderson, Robin N. Beaumont, David A. Bechtold, Brian E. Cade, Mary Haas, Sekar Kathiresan, Max A. Little, Annemarie I. Luik, Andrew S. Loudon, Shaun Purcell, Rebecca C. Richmond, Frank A. J. L. Scheer, Barbara Schormair, Jessica Tyrrell, John W. Winkelman, Juliane Winkelmann, Kristian Hveem, Chen Zhao, Jonas B. Nielsen, Cristen J. Willer, Susan Redline, Kai Spiegelhalder, Simon D. Kyle, David W. Ray, John-Anker Zwart, Ben Brumpton, Timothy M. Frayling, Deborah A. Lawlor, Martin K. Rutter, Michael N. Weedon, Richa Saxena

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 289 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 14%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 100 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 10%
Psychology 26 9%
Neuroscience 23 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 124 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 410. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#72,220
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#101
of 7,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,482
of 367,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#6
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.