You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biological and clinical insights from genetics of insomnia symptoms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-019-0361-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline M. Lane, Samuel E. Jones, Hassan S. Dashti, Andrew R. Wood, Krishna G. Aragam, Vincent T. van Hees, Linn B. Strand, Bendik S. Winsvold, Heming Wang, Jack Bowden, Yanwei Song, Krunal Patel, Simon G. Anderson, Robin N. Beaumont, David A. Bechtold, Brian E. Cade, Mary Haas, Sekar Kathiresan, Max A. Little, Annemarie I. Luik, Andrew S. Loudon, Shaun Purcell, Rebecca C. Richmond, Frank A. J. L. Scheer, Barbara Schormair, Jessica Tyrrell, John W. Winkelman, Juliane Winkelmann, Kristian Hveem, Chen Zhao, Jonas B. Nielsen, Cristen J. Willer, Susan Redline, Kai Spiegelhalder, Simon D. Kyle, David W. Ray, John-Anker Zwart, Ben Brumpton, Timothy M. Frayling, Deborah A. Lawlor, Martin K. Rutter, Michael N. Weedon, Richa Saxena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 57% |
| Scientists | 37 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Professor | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 18% |
| Unknown | 102 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 10% |
| Psychology | 26 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 126 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 410. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#72,986
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#104
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,490
of 368,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#6
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.