↓ Skip to main content

Reporting Quantitative Methods and Findings: Best Practices Fidelity in the Leisure Science Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Leisure Sciences, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reporting Quantitative Methods and Findings: Best Practices Fidelity in the Leisure Science Literature
Published in
Leisure Sciences, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/01490400.2019.1571969
Authors

Mat D Duerden, Eric Keith Layland, Andrew Lacanienta, Camilla Hodge, Michael Goates, Michael B Edwards

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,286,040
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Leisure Sciences
#209
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,978
of 353,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leisure Sciences
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.