↓ Skip to main content

Of Mice and Roentgen: Radiologist Satisfaction with a Non-conventional 13-Button Mouse—One Institution’s Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Digital Imaging, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Of Mice and Roentgen: Radiologist Satisfaction with a Non-conventional 13-Button Mouse—One Institution’s Experience
Published in
Journal of Digital Imaging, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10278-018-0094-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Denton, Irfanullah Haider, Jacqueline Hill, Suzanne L. Hunt, Ryan Ash

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,009,288
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#821
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,616
of 329,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.