↓ Skip to main content

Raman spectroscopic grading of astrocytoma tissues: using soft reference information

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Raman spectroscopic grading of astrocytoma tissues: using soft reference information
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00216-011-4985-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Beleites, Kathrin Geiger, Matthias Kirsch, Stephan B. Sobottka, Gabriele Schackert, Reiner Salzer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Turkey 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 18%
Chemistry 7 14%
Computer Science 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,002,384
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,500
of 9,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,869
of 124,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#76
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,765 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.