↓ Skip to main content

On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation
Published in
Cognition, July 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul E. Dux, Veronika Coltheart, Irina M. Harris

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 51 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 11 20%
Professor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 50%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Linguistics 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#1,919
of 3,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,334
of 67,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.