You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Widespread global peatland establishment and persistence over the last 130,000 y
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1813305116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire C. Treat, Thomas Kleinen, Nils Broothaerts, April S. Dalton, René Dommain, Thomas A. Douglas, Judith Z. Drexler, Sarah A. Finkelstein, Guido Grosse, Geoffrey Hope, Jack Hutchings, Miriam C. Jones, Peter Kuhry, Terri Lacourse, Outi Lähteenoja, Julie Loisel, Bastiaan Notebaert, Richard J. Payne, Dorothy M. Peteet, A. Britta K. Sannel, Jonathan M. Stelling, Jens Strauss, Graeme T. Swindles, Julie Talbot, Charles Tarnocai, Gert Verstraeten, Christopher J. Williams, Zhengyu Xia, Zicheng Yu, Minna Väliranta, Martina Hättestrand, Helena Alexanderson, Victor Brovkin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Finland | 5 | 11% |
| Sweden | 4 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 53% |
| Scientists | 19 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 48 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 87 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#570,352
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,892
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,171
of 371,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#214
of 1,067 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,067 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.