↓ Skip to main content

Finding plausible and diverse variants of a climate model. Part 1: establishing the relationship between errors at weather and climate time scales

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Finding plausible and diverse variants of a climate model. Part 1: establishing the relationship between errors at weather and climate time scales
Published in
Climate Dynamics, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04625-3
Authors

D. M. H. Sexton, A. V. Karmalkar, J. M. Murphy, K. D. Williams, I. A. Boutle, C. J. Morcrette, A. J. Stirling, S. B. Vosper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 56%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,860,968
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#413
of 5,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,777
of 353,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#11
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.