↓ Skip to main content

Sight or insight? Child therapy with a blind clinician

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Social Work Journal, June 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Sight or insight? Child therapy with a blind clinician
Published in
Clinical Social Work Journal, June 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02190473
Authors

Barbara A. Ceconi, Esther Urdang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 44%
Social Sciences 4 44%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,562,306
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Social Work Journal
#429
of 1,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,061
of 22,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Social Work Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.