| Title |
An Analysis of 1–3-Year Follow-up Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: an Indian Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Surgery, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-012-0599-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Parmanand Prasad, Om Tantia, Nirmal Patle, Shashi Khanna, Bimalendu Sen |
| Abstract |
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become very popular nowadays among bariatric surgeons because of its surgical simplicity and good postoperative results. We present our experience on LSG as a single stage primary bariatric procedure for morbid obesity and its 1-3-year follow-up results. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 62% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Energy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2012.
All research outputs
#18,303,566
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,525
of 3,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,847
of 243,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.