| Title |
A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x701813 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Sidaway-Lee, Denis Pereira Gray, Philip Evans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 50% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Scientists | 6 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#822,840
of 25,282,542 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#354
of 4,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,171
of 360,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#14
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,282,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.