↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Pneumonia and Oral Care in Nursing Home Residents

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 883)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Association Between Pneumonia and Oral Care in Nursing Home Residents
Published in
Lung, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00408-011-9297-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali A. El-Solh

Abstract

Pneumonia remains the leading cause of death in nursing home residents. The accumulation of dental plaque and colonization of oral surfaces and dentures with respiratory pathogens serves as a reservoir for recurrent lower respiratory tract infections. Control of gingivitis and dental plaques has been effective in reducing the rate of pneumonia but the provision of dental care for institutionalized elderly is inadequate, with treatment often sought only when patients experience pain or denture problems. Direct mechanical cleaning is thwarted by the lack of adequate training of nursing staff and residents' uncooperativeness. Chlorhexidine-based interventions are advocated as alternative methods for managing the oral health of frail older people; however, efficacy is yet to be demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. Development and maintenance of an oral hygiene program is a critical step in the prevention of pneumonia. While resources may be limited in long-term-care facilities, incorporating oral care in daily routine practice helps to reduce systemic diseases and to promote overall quality of life in nursing home residents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 46 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,674,180
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#29
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,328
of 109,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them