↓ Skip to main content

Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: a test of the hyporheic refuge hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: a test of the hyporheic refuge hypothesis
Published in
Oecologia, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00317217
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. A. Palmer, A. E. Bely, K. E. Berg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 87 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 14 14%
Professor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 42%
Environmental Science 31 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,835,693
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,421
of 4,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,828
of 62,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.