| Title |
Impact of Procedure Time on Outcomes of Thrombectomy for Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ali Alawieh, Jan Vargas, Kyle M. Fargen, E. Farris Langley, Robert M. Starke, Reade De Leacy, Rano Chatterjee, Ansaar Rai, Travis Dumont, Peter Kan, David McCarthy, Fábio A. Nascimento, Jasmeet Singh, Lukas Vilella, Aquilla Turk, Alejandro M. Spiotta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 65% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2021.
All research outputs
#475,962
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,181
of 16,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,004
of 368,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#41
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.