| Title |
Ocular toxicity of intravitreal melphalan for retinoblastoma in Chinese patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12886-019-1059-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kang Xue, Hui Ren, Fengxi Meng, Rui Zhang, Jiang Qian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,250,548
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#215
of 2,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,240
of 353,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,431 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.