↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Immunology

Overview of attention for book
Tumor Immunology
Elsevier
Attention for Chapter: Mouse Models of Tumor Immunotherapy
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mouse Models of Tumor Immunotherapy
Book title
Tumor Immunology
Published in
Advances in Immunology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/bs.ai.2015.12.004
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-805156-6
Authors

Shin Foong Ngiow, Sherene Loi, David Thomas, Mark J. Smyth, Ngiow, Shin Foong, Loi, Sherene, Thomas, David, Smyth, Mark J, Smyth, Mark J.

Abstract

Immunotherapy is now evolving into a major therapeutic option for cancer patients. Such clinical advances also promote massive interest in the search for novel immunotherapy targets, and to understand the mechanism of action of current drugs. It is projected that a series of novel immunotherapy agents will be developed and assessed for their therapeutic activity. In light of this, in vivo experimental mouse models that recapitulate human malignancies serve as valuable tools to validate the efficacy and safety profile of immunotherapy agents, before their transition into clinical trials. In this review, we will discuss the major classes of experimental mouse models of cancer commonly used for immunotherapy assessment and provide examples to guide the selection of appropriate models. We present some new data concerning the utility of a carcinogen-induced tumor model for comparing immunotherapies and combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy. We will also highlight some recent advances in experimental modeling of human malignancies in mice that are leading towards personalized therapy in patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Immunology
#233
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,141
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Immunology
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.