↓ Skip to main content

The role of infection in the aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The role of infection in the aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00535-009-0191-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Hansen, John M. Thomson, Emad M. El-Omar, Georgina L. Hold

Abstract

We have greatly increased our understanding of the genetics of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the last decade; however, migrant studies highlight the importance of environment in disease risk. The possibility that IBD is an infection has been debated since the first description of Crohn's disease. Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis was the first organism to be suggested as an IBD pathogen, and it has been argued that it fulfils Koch's postulates and could be designated the cause of Crohn's disease. Other organisms have been postulated as possible IBD pathogens, including various Helicobacter species, one of which has been identified in primate colitis;others are widely used in animal models of IBD. Adherent invasive Escherichia coli appear specific to ileal Crohn's disease and have been shown to induce the release of TNF-alpha, a key cytokine in IBD inflammation. The aim of this article is to give a concise overview of the infections postulated as being relevant to the onset of IBD. We will also briefly cover the immunology underpinning IBD, in addition to reviewing current knowledge regarding other microorganisms that are associated with modifying the risk of developing IBD. It may be that infectious organisms have an orchestrator role in the development of dysbiosis and subsequently IBD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 18 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,654,408
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#810
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,773
of 179,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.