↓ Skip to main content

Towards testing big data analytics software: the essential role of metamorphic testing

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Towards testing big data analytics software: the essential role of metamorphic testing
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12551-018-0492-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiyi Zhang, Xiaoyuan Xie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 58%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,669,294
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#495
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,731
of 435,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.