| Title |
Spatial distribution of Haemaphysalis species ticks and human Kyasanur Forest Disease cases along the Western Ghats of India, 2017–2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental and Applied Acarology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10493-019-00345-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Naren Babu, Anup Jayaram, H. Hemanth Kumar, Prashant Pareet, Sarthak Pattanaik, Amogh Milind Auti, Jazeel Abdulmajeed, Hindol Maity, Santhosha Devadiga, Yuvraj Bhandari, H. Agre Deepchand, Muhammed Shakir, Nishikant Kumar, Govindakarnavar Arunkumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 45% |
| Nepal | 2 | 18% |
| Qatar | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,905,283
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#67
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,088
of 355,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them