↓ Skip to main content

Critical assessment and ramifications of a purported marine trophic cascade

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
241 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical assessment and ramifications of a purported marine trophic cascade
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep20970
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Dean Grubbs, John K. Carlson, Jason G. Romine, Tobey H. Curtis, W. David McElroy, Camilla T. McCandless, Charles F. Cotton, John A. Musick

Abstract

When identifying potential trophic cascades, it is important to clearly establish the trophic linkages between predators and prey with respect to temporal abundance, demographics, distribution, and diet. In the northwest Atlantic Ocean, the depletion of large coastal sharks was thought to trigger a trophic cascade whereby predation release resulted in increased cownose ray abundance, which then caused increased predation on and subsequent collapse of commercial bivalve stocks. These claims were used to justify the development of a predator-control fishery for cownose rays, the "Save the Bay, Eat a Ray" fishery, to reduce predation on commercial bivalves. A reexamination of data suggests declines in large coastal sharks did not coincide with purported rapid increases in cownose ray abundance. Likewise, the increase in cownose ray abundance did not coincide with declines in commercial bivalves. The lack of temporal correlations coupled with published diet data suggest the purported trophic cascade is lacking the empirical linkages required of a trophic cascade. Furthermore, the life history parameters of cownose rays suggest they have low reproductive potential and their populations are incapable of rapid increases. Hypothesized trophic cascades should be closely scrutinized as spurious conclusions may negatively influence conservation and management decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 365 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 18%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Other 13 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 68 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 182 49%
Environmental Science 71 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 85 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 258. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#142,429
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,737
of 141,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,604
of 413,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#45
of 3,492 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,492 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.