You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unravelling the stealth effect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Nanotechnology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nnano.2016.6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neville J. Butcher, Gysell M. Mortimer, Rodney F. Minchin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 27% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 27 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,717,826
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#2,020
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,788
of 418,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#51
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.